<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: High Priest of the Church of Satan Anton LaVey</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.illuminatiarchives.org/ru/satanic/high-priest-of-the-church-of-satan-anton-lavey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.illuminatiarchives.org/satanic/high-priest-of-the-church-of-satan-anton-lavey/</link>
	<description>Illuminati Videos, Occult Documentaries and Conspiracy Media</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 05:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: RnGram</title>
		<link>http://www.illuminatiarchives.org/satanic/high-priest-of-the-church-of-satan-anton-lavey/comment-page-1/#comment-45223</link>
		<dc:creator>RnGram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 01:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.illuminatiarchives.org/satanic/high-priest-of-the-church-of-satan-anton-lavey/#comment-45223</guid>
		<description>LaVey might have used her name, but anyone who has read Rand with a fraction of honest interpretation would know that she would have viewed his group as so utterly irrational as to be unworthy of the slightest comment.   She might suggest that any who believe LaVey had anything to do with her ideas should perhaps read "Atlas Shrugged".  But then, many others (bloggers, journalists, university intellectuals and the like) have read her works and utterly failed to grasp significant meaning from it &lt;i&gt;because of their own preconceptions, biases and inability to read about ideas thoughtfully&lt;/i&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LaVey might have used her name, but anyone who has read Rand with a fraction of honest interpretation would know that she would have viewed his group as so utterly irrational as to be unworthy of the slightest comment.   She might suggest that any who believe LaVey had anything to do with her ideas should perhaps read &#8220;Atlas Shrugged&#8221;.  But then, many others (bloggers, journalists, university intellectuals and the like) have read her works and utterly failed to grasp significant meaning from it <i>because of their own preconceptions, biases and inability to read about ideas thoughtfully</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
