HELENA BLAVATSKY VS THE NEW AGE MOVEMENT PART 1 (HD)

revillusi0nz asked:


** revillusi0nz Note to Viewers: I am not a Satanist. I do not worship Lucifer. I have studied the Secret Doctrine (not all, but some) and I can make my own discernments. I suggest that before you make judgements on anyone, including me, you investigate it first.** www.blavatsky.net Interview with Michael Tsarion, with Chris Geo, on Madame Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, Theosophy michaeltsarion.com truthfrequencyradio.com SUBSCRIBE www.youtube.com

20 comments:

  1. SovereignBeing

    @Zakah1 Yeah he was one of her ‘Ass-ended masters’, they were really her handlers and St Germain was a reptilian shapeshifter… deceptive to the core.

  2. kensei85

    Who’s gonna be defended next? Albert Pike? Aleister Crowley? The concept of the self that Blavatsky and Ayn Rand present is the core aspect of their philosophy that I disagree with. For this simple reason: good people are selfless, bad people are selfish.

  3. SteveTrinity2

    To all those who are stuck in the Heaven and Hell realm ~ there are vasts amounts of information about suppressed truths of this world and of other worlds that seem to be uncovered by yourself or that you may refuse to believe because of the limitations that many holy books staple into the mind~

  4. kansasisaband

    @shedendpussys I’m on your side, to some degree. I believe it’s “Ya-hweh Yahuwshua” as the name above all names. Either way, I’m just trying to figure out how any answer, any name, any religion or any “opinion” about an infinite “Creator Being” could even be “Name-able” at this plane of existence. And if there was a name, don’t you think that it’s been long lost after all these centuries of lies and deceit and omission and suppression and execution and greed, murder, etc. We don’t know shit.

  5. kansasisaband

    @shedendpussys this would confirm that the term “God” is a false name for the original Creator of the universe? I believe it’s from the word “Gad”, a false name for the true Creator. A blasphemy? Does this information suggest that “God” is the creator, ie, Satan? Lucifer? Is there a difference between these two? Intriguing.

  6. RunAMuckGirl2

    This interview is *very* interesting. Thank you. I’m not even convinced that Alice Baily is what they are making her out to be today either. I found her books enlightening. At the time I read some of Baily’s work, I was not aware of Helena Blavatsky or her role as teacher. So many books, so little time. LOL

  7. kwarrior101

    @revillusi0nz hey where can i get a hold of this info? i see that some things are starting to make sense but wow i would like a suggestion. i have read quite a bit but the stuff on the free and the bound, the virginal and the fallen. and i like your work.

  8. revillusi0nz

    @revillusi0nz When the Church, therefore, curses Satan, it curses the cosmic reflection of God; it anathematizes God made in matter or in the objective; it maledicts God, or the ever-incomprehensible WISDOM, revealing itself as Light and Shadow, good and evil in nature, in the only manner comprehensible to the limited intellect of MAN.

  9. revillusi0nz

    @revillusi0nz And both are the Ministers of the Father, fulfilling the word Divine….” Therefore–

    “Holy is the Sabbath of god: blessed and sanctified is the name of the Angel of Havas” — SATAN.

    For, “The glory of Satan is the shadow of the Lord”: God in the manifested world; “the throne of Satan is the footstool of Adonai” — that footstool being the whole KOSMOS.

  10. revillusi0nz

    @revillusi0nz “… Upon Satan only is the shame of generation. He hath lost his virginal estate (so hath the Kumâra by incarnating): uncovering heavenly secrets, he hath entered into bondage…. He compasseth with bonds and limits all things….”

    “Twain are the armies of God: in heaven the hosts of Michael; in the abyss (the manifested world) the legions of Satan. These are the unmanifest and the manifest; the free and the bound (in matter): the virginal and the fallen.

  11. revillusi0nz

    @revillusi0nz The Gnostics were right, then, in calling the Jewish god “an angel of matter,” or he who breathed (conscious) life into Adam, and he whose planet was Saturn. “And God hath put a girdle about his loins (the rings of Saturn), and the name of the girdle is Death.”

    In anthropogony this “girdle” is the human body with its two lower principles, which three die, while the innermost man is immortal. And now we approach the “Secret of Satan.”

  12. revillusi0nz

    @shedendpussys and this without any illusive metaphor to its wickedness and depravity. For he is one with the Logos, “the first son, eldest of the gods,” in the order of microcosmic (divine) evolution; Saturn (Satan), astronomically, “is the seventh and last in the order of macrocosmic emanation, being the circumference of the kingdom of which Phœbus (the light of wisdom, also the Sun) is the centre.”

  13. vangelis721

    YOU REV a New Ager? NO. A great young docu-mentalist/researcher… I’d concur. Yes. Don’t let the bastards drag you down. Tsarion wouldn’t know half of what he does without his Rosicrucian lineage. Good work…Peace……………….R

  14. shedendpussys

    “It is Satan who is the God of our planet and the only God.”
    ~ Helena Petrovna Blavatsky

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>